Home » Support » Page 10
Support
-
Numbering
-
Neck Torsion
-
Outer Rib Band Test
-
Neck Load Cells
-
Orthotropic materials
-
No matter how I’ve tried, I can’t trim the elements with the IGES line data. Is there any alternative to do trimming?
-
Numbering Scheme
-
Numbering
-
Optimization
-
Neck Pendulum Test
-
Numbering
-
Not a Number (NaN)
-
Negative volume in soft materials
-
Negative volumes in brick elements
-
Optimization
-
Official Release of LS-TaSC (Topology and Shape Computation) available
-
Multiobjective Optimization
-
Multi-level Optimization
-
Multi-objective optimization (MOO)
-
Mass Measurements
-
Marker Evaluation
-
Marker Evaluation
-
Manuals
-
Mass scaling
-
Mass report in D3HSP file
-
Mass scaling
-
Manuals
-
Modeling guidelines for full vehicle contact
-
Modeling guidelines for full vehicle contact
-
Modell Check / Initialisation Run
-
Metal forming
-
Material Tests
-
Material Tests
-
Material models for polymers
-
Material
-
Material model for TRIP-steels
-
Miscellaneous
-
Metal Forming Optimization
-
Metal Forming
-
LST Free Motion Headform
-
LS-Prepost
-
Lumbar Load Cell
-
LS-TaSC 2022 R1
-
Lumbar Spine Tests
-
LS-Post binary database
-
LS-TaSC 2021 R1
-
LS-TaSC 4.2
-
LS-TaSC 4.1
-
LS-TaSC 4.0
-
LS-TaSC 3.2
-
LS-TaSC 3.1
-
LS-TaSC 3.0
-
LS-TaSC 2.1
-
LS-TaSC 2.0
-
LS-PrePost
-
LS-PrePost
-
Managing disk space during run time
-
LS-TaSC
-
LS-OPT User’s Group on Google
-
LS-OPT
-
LS-DYNA V971 R6.1.2 (R6.85274) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R6.1.1 (R6.78769) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R6.1.0 (R6.74904) released
-
LS-OPT Support Site
-
LS-OPT 7.0
-
LS-OPT 6.0
-
LS-OPT 5.2
-
LS-OPT 5.1
-
LS-OPT 5.0
-
LS-OPT 4.3
-
LS-OPT 4.1
-
LS-OPT 4.2
-
LS-OPT 4.0
-
LS-OPT 3.4
-
LS-OPT 3.3
-
LS-OPT 3.2
-
LS-OPT Training Class Tutorial Problems
-
LS-OPT
-
LS-OPT cannot find the output file from the FE preprocessor
-
LS-DYNA User’s Guide
-
LS-DYNA R9.3.1 (R9.140922; 2019/10) released
-
LS-DYNA R9.3.0 (R9.128342; 2018/07) released
-
LS-DYNA R9.3.0 (R9.128342; 2018/07) released
-
LS-DYNA R9.2.0 (R9.119543; 2017/08) released
-
LS-DYNA R9.1.0 (R9.113698; 2018/02) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R4.2.1 (R4.53450) released
-
LS-DYNA V970 Revision 3858
-
LS-DYNA V970 Revision 6763
-
LS-DYNA V971 R4.2 (R4.50638) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R3.2.1 (R3.47756) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R3.2 (R3.46862) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R3.1 (R3.43919) released
-
LS-DYNA support
-
LS-DYNA runs into Segmentation Violation (SIGSEGV) error. What can I do?
-
LS-DYNA V970 Revision 3858 (MPP only)
-
LS-DYNA V971 R6.0.0 (R6.71488) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R5.1.1 (R5.65550) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R5.1 (R5.64536) released
-
LS-DYNA V971 R5.0 (R5.59419) released
-
LS-DYNA R15.0.0 released (2024/02)
-
LS-DYNA R14.1.0 released (2023/12)
-
LS-DYNA R12.2.1 released (2023/05)
-
LS-DYNA R14.0.0 released (2023/05)
-
LS-DYNA R13.1.0 released (2022/03)
-
LS-DYNA R11.2.0 released (2020/12)
-
LS-DYNA R12.0.0 (R12.148978; 2020/07) released
-
LS-DYNA R11.1.0 (R11.139588; 2019/08) released
-
LS-DYNA R9.0.1 (R9.109912; 2016/08) released
-
LS-DYNA R7.1.3 (R7.107967) released
-
LS-DYNA R8.1.0 (R8.105896) released
-
LS-DYNA R8.0.0 (R8.95309) released
-
LS-DYNA R7.1.2 (R7.95028) released
-
LS-DYNA R7.1.1 (R7.88575) released
-
LS-DYNA R7.1.0 (R7.88052) released
-
LS-DYNA R7.0.0 (R7.79069) released
-
LS-DYNA R15.0.2 released (2024/03)
-
LS-DYNA R15.0.1 released (2024/03)
-
LS-DYNA R11.2.2 released (2021/06)
-
LS-DYNA R11.2.1 released (2021/03)
-
Local Coordinate Systems
-
Limitations and Further Work
-
License File and Usage
-
Load Cells
-
LS-DYNA Manuals
-
Knee Load Cells
-
LS-DYNA R10.2.0 (R10.135267; 2019/03) released
-
LS-DYNA R11.0.0 (R11.129956; 2018/09) released
-
LS-DYNA R10.1.0 (R10.123355; 2018/02) released
-
LS-DYNA R10.0.0 (R10.118302; 2017/07) released
-
LS-DYNA 971-7600.398 released
-
LS-DYNA 971-7600.129 released
-
LS-DYNA 970.5434a released
-
LS-DYNA 971-7600.1224 released
-
LS-DYNA 971-7600.1077 released
-
License File and Usage
-
Locking in a quadrilateral element
-
LS-DYNA 971-7600.1116 released
-
Links
-
Load Cases
-
Keywords Used
-
Keywords used
-
Is it possible to allow separation/gap between elements within one part?
-
Is it possible to allow separation/gap between elements within one part?
-
Is there a way to prevent distortion?
-
Keywords Used
-
Knee and Ankle Rotation
-
IR-TRACCs length and relative rotation
-
Keywords Used
-
Introduction LS-DYNA/LS-PrePost for explicit and implicit analysis
-
Internal Energy
-
Joint stiffness
-
Is it possible to coarsen a uniformly refined mesh, as well as an adaptively generated mesh?
-
Is it possible to do forming simulation by using both implicit and explicit method in the same run?
-
Is the order relevant in which I do triming and coarsening of the mesh?
-
Is there a way to reduce the penetration problem?
-
Is there any limitation for LSDYNA3D to be applied to Metal-Forming analysis?
-
Integrating a Pre-Processor: METApost
-
Integrating Excel
-
Is it possible to skip the reading of large include files?
-
Injury Criteria
-
Initial Penetrations
-
In implicit analysis of springback process, there are both linear and non-linear methods. Can you advise which one is better?
-
In implicit forming analysis, I found that the friction force was not properly applied, what could have been the problem?
-
In my simulation, some of the corner nodes can be put in the wrong place. Can you advise what the problem is?
-
In springback analysis, I found that my constraint hasn’t been taken into account during the simulation, what was the problem?
-
Injury Criteria
-
Inner Rib Band with damping material
-
Injury Criteria
-
Install a New Network License (Microsoft Windows)
-
Install a New Network License (Linux/Unix/Solaris)
-
In LS-DYNA, there are different material models and I’ve found it difficult to choose the proper material model. Would you please give me some suggestions in selecting the proper material model?
-
In my analysis of the sheet metal forming process, I frequently found that the calculation could not continue and it terminated unexpectedly. Is there a way to avoid this?
-
In springback analysis I don’t have enough memory or the analysis takes too much time. What can I do ?
-
In springback analysis, I just changed the constrained nodes a little bit away from the original node. The convergence then became very different and the predicted result seems not to be reasonable. What can be the problem?
-
In springback analysis, we had no problem when gravity effect is not considered. However, after gravity effect is included in the input deck, there were some strange error messages. What might be the cause?
-
Important information about LS-PrePost
-
Import User Results
-
Integrating a Pre-Processor
-
Import Design Functions
-
Implicit: Mortar Contact
-
I tried to use LSPOST to compare the strain state with FLD. When I selected the element and clicked the plot button, nothing was plotted. What was the problem?
-
If a converged solution from springback prediction cannot be obtained after trying many different combinations of parameters, what else can I do?
-
If I didn’t find wrinkling and strain localization in from my simulation, can I say that my design is good?
-
If localized necking occurs what can I do to get rid of it?
-
If wrinkling occurs, what can I do to get rid of it?
-
Iliac Wing Tests
-
Implicit: Convergence
-
Implicit: Dynamic relaxation
-
Implicit
-
Implicit: Loads on rigidbodies
-
Implicit: Contact treatment
-
Implicit: Memory notes
-
Implicit: Recommendation on solid element formulation
-
Implicit: Checklist
-
I have very long run times. What can I do?
-
I just have one IGES file for the part, and I don’t want to offset the surface for the punch and die physically. Is it possible to offset the two surfaces internally inside LSDYNA3D? If yes, how do you offset these two surfaces?
-
I think spring back prediction by using implicit is not realistic. What is your opinion regarding the convergence issue?
-
If I use very coarse mesh for the pre-deformation (such as pre-bending, gravity loading etc), and then refine the mesh in the later forming analysis. Will it result in obvious numerical error for the final results?
-
I’ve found that when I use several CPUs with the SMP code that only one CPU is working and the other CPUs are idle. What is the problem and how can it be corrected?
-
HowTos
-
How do you trim the blank after a forming analysis?
-
How do you trim the blank after a forming analysis?
-
How do you use RIGID_BODY_STOPPER?
-
How is the FLD obtained in LSPOST? What is the limitation of using this FLD?
-
How many levels of adaptive mesh do I need in my calculation?
-
How to do hydro forming analysis?
-
How to use non-smooth trimming?
-
I generated a dynain file after forming analysis. Additionally, I used DYNAFORM to trim the mesh, and did springback prediction. However, I found that the predicted springback is too small to be true. What is the problem?
-
How to read NASTRAN bulk data files.
-
I found that the number of adapted elements was too large when I performed a multi-stage forming analysis using adaptivity. Is there a way to avoid this problem?
-
I had no problem in running a forming job, however, when I used adaptive method, the contact does work properly even from the beginning without adaptivity. What is the problem?
-
I have no experience in springback prediction, and have no idea whether my prediction is reasonable. Do you have any idea how accurate the solution could be from LSDYNA?
-
HowTos
-
Hypergraph
-
HyperMorph
-
How does the point selection algorithm work for probabilistic variables?
-
How does the domain reduction in SRSM work for discrete variables?
-
How to specify Abnormal Termination when using runqueuer/wrapper?
-
How is it topology optimization different from sizing and shape optimization?
-
Head Restraint Force
-
History Variables for Certain Material Models
-
Head position adjustment
-
How can I evaluate material formability for a new material?
-
How can I specify friction coefficient in the contact interface?
-
Hourglass
-
How can nodal accelerations be evaluated in LS-DYNA?
-
How can I handle contact between beams and shells?
-
How can you add constraints for a springback analysis?
-
How are predicted histories calculated?
-
How can I ensure that LS-OPT replaces the variables in the input file by integer values?
-
How can the number of solver jobs to be run in parallel be defined?
-
How can I determine the time value where a history curve takes a specific value?
-
How do I specify the draw bead force?
-
How contact works
-
How can you evaluate the material formability under complexity deformation condition or multiple steps forming?
-
How do I choose the element type for the analysis of sheet metal stamping?
-
How do I implement my own FLD in LSPOST?
-
How do I use define draw bead in stamping analysis?
-
How do you perform a multiple step analysis?
-
General Information
-
General Information
-
General Information
-
General Information
-
Generalizing the yield function
-
General remarks on implicit time integration
-
General
-
General
-
General
-
Generic Extractor (GenEx)
-
GenEx
-
Getting Started
-
Head Acceleration
-
Getting Started with LS-TaSC 3.0
-
Head Drop Test
-
Head Neck Tests
-
Head Acceleration
-
Getting Started
-
Getting started with LS-DYNA
-
Gravity Load
-
File organization
-
Femoral Load Cells
-
Flat Barrier
-
Extra history variables
-
FAQ
-
Examples: Optimization
-
Examples: Robustness
-
Examples: Parameter Identification
-
FAQs
-
Future Work
-
Flat Barrier : Arm Position — Second Notch
-
Flat Barrier : Arm Position — First Notch
-
Flat Barrier and WorldSID without Arm
-
General
-
Force Analysis
-
Forces of nodes
-
From engineering to true strain, true stress
-
Force transducer
-
Full Vehicle MDO
-
General
-
Dummy Model Support
-
ES-2 and ES-2re
-
EDGE-to-EDGE Contact
-
Elements and material models available for implicit
-
Even if I include the card of *CONTROL_ADAPTIVE in my input deck, the blank is not adapted. How can I fix this problem?
-
Edge-to-edge contact
-
Dynamic relaxation
-
Energy data
-
Elements
-
Element Locking
-
Effective plastic strain
-
Environment variables
-
Equation of state
-
Eulerian method; basics
-
Element
-
During the forming analysis I found that some elements in the blank became distorted. How can this problem be solved?
-
Downloads
-
Examples
-
Download more examples
-
Evaluate Metamodels
-
Differences ES-2 and ES-2re Models
-
Discrete Beam
-
Deflections & Rotations
-
Crashworthiness Optimization
-
Cross section
-
Damping
-
Define composites
-
Design variables
-
Direct Optimization
-
Curve Mapping
-
Creating imperfections in LS-DYNA® using the *PERTURBATION keyword
-
Curve Matching Metrics
-
Do I have an easier way to define the velocity curve?
-
Do I have to consider the thickness of the blank?
-
Documents and Manuals
-
Documents and Manual
-
Double precision
-
Do you have tips how to combat instabilities?
-
Do I have to consider the thickness of the rigid bodies?
-
Documents
-
Contact Definitions
-
Contact Modeling in LS-DYNA
-
Contact types
-
Contact parameters
-
Contact modeling in LS-DYNA
-
Contact Definitions
-
Contact Definitions
-
Contact output
-
Contact stiffness calculation
-
Constraints and spotwelds
-
Contact Energy
-
Contact between Beam and Shell Elements
-
Coordinate system for stress
-
Contact stiffness influenced by time step size
-
Contact timestep
-
Contact
-
Contact overview
-
Contact thickness
-
Contact
-
Coupling ANSA
-
Component Tests
-
Configuration C
-
Configuration F
-
Concrete models
-
Common Workflow: positioning under gravity load
-
Can I arbitrarily pick the nodes to constrain for a springback analysis?
-
Configuration A
-
Configuration B
-
Configuration D
-
Configuration E
-
Constraint counting
-
Computational plasticity
-
Consistent units
-
Cohesive material models
-
Composite models
-
Cohesive element formulation
-
Can you advise how to improve the speed in the forming analysis? The user may choose either mass scaling or velocity scaling. It is very common to use a combination of the two methods. Extreme care should be taken when using both.
-
Can you explain the failure behaviors that occur in sheet metal forming?
-
Constrained space filling – Reasonable Design Space
-
Can LS-OPT handle discrete variables?
-
Additional Shoulder-Rib test
-
Additional Remarks
-
After the trimming process, some of the elements in the blank mesh have become distorted around the trim line. How can this be avoided?
-
BioRID II
-
Calibration Tests
-
Calibration Tests
-
An example using GenEx to extract responses
-
Calibration Tests
-
Arm bending
-
Arm joint
-
Arm Tests
-
Airbag contact
-
Anisotropic plasticity models
-
ALE history variables
-
Beam
-
An example using “Column vector” to extract histories
-
An example using “Repeated anchor vector” to extract histories
-
ANSA
-
Applications of Optimization
-
Algorithms
-
Accelerations
-
3.9 to 4.0.1
-
Abdomen Pendulum Test
-
A pathological case of volume locking in triangular elements
-
Abaqus
-
Accelerometers
-
Additional Remarks
-
Accelerometers
-
Additional Outputs
-
Additional Remarks
-
Accelerometers
-
Accuracy
-
Additional Material
-
Overview
-
Overview
-
Pelvis Certification Test
-
Pelvis Acceleration
-
Pelvis Load Cell
-
Overview
-
Pelvis Force
-
Pelvis and Torso Angle
-
Pelvis Pendulum Test
-
Outer Rib Band Vertical Pendulum Test with Arm
-
Outer Rib Band Test with Arm
-
Outer Rib Band Vertical Pendulum Test
-
Overview
-
Pelvis Acceleration
-
Overview of available Dummy Models
-
Part inertia
-
Papers
-
Parameter Identification
-
Parameterization of input curves: Optimizing LS-DYNA input curves
-
Parameter Identification
-
Positioning
-
Positioning, Tree File
-
Positioning File
-
Pre-stressed Parts
-
Performance
-
Pelvis Tests
-
Pubic Symphysis Load Cell
-
Performance
-
Pelvis Shape Barrier
-
Pelvis Shape Barrier : Arm Position — Second Notch
-
Pelvis Shape Barrier : Arm Position — First Notch
-
Pelvis Shape Barrier and WorldSID without Jacket
-
Positioning, Tree File
-
Performance
-
Performance under MPP
-
Preload general
-
Perl
-
Perl
-
Probabilistic Variables: What is the difference between control and noise variables?
-
Postprocessing
-
Repairing Seatbelt Elements
-
Release notes v7.6
-
Release notes v6.0
-
Release notes v5.0
-
Release notes v5.0
-
Release notes up to v4.0
-
Release Notes
-
Release Notes
-
Release_Notes_LS-DYNA_R13_0
-
Release Notes
-
Release notes v8.0
-
Release Notes
-
Radial Return
-
Quasistatic simulation
-
Recommendations for structural impact
-
Release Notes
-
Release Notes LS-OPT
-
Release Notes LS-TaSC
-
Reliability Analysis
-
RBDO
-
Results of Spine Fixed up to T1
-
Results of Spine Fixed up to T8
-
Results of Spine Fixed up to L6
-
Rib Deflections 1D (up to hardware SBL E)
-
Rib Deflections 2D (from hardware SBL E)
-
Rib Accelerations
-
Rib Intrusion
-
Responses
-
Result extraction for LS-DYNA input files using *CASE
-
Selective mass scaling (SMS)
-
Sacro-Iliac Load Cells
-
Rib Rotations
-
Robustness
-
Rigid body contact
-
Rigid wall contact
-
Sense switch control
-
Robust Parameter Design
-
Sensitivity Analysis
-
Setting parameters in the Genetic algorithm
-
Run
-
Sled Test with Spine only
-
Sign Convention
-
Shoulder Load Cells
-
Shoulder Pendulum Test
-
Shell offset
-
Shell output
-
Shell Formulations
-
Shell Strain
-
Shooting node
-
Shape Optimization
-
Setup
-
Spine Acceleration
-
SOFT option
-
Some guidelines for implicit analyses using LS-DYNA
-
Sled Tests with Spine
-
Spherical Joint Forces
-
Sled Tests
-
Solving problems with path dependent materials
-
Solid output
-
SMOOTH option
-
Thorax Certification Test
-
The Next Step
-
The equations for isotropic von Mises plasticity
-
Sports Car Seat
-
There are several linear solvers for implicit analysis. Can you tell me which one is the fastest and most accurate?
-
There are several non-linear solvers for implicit analysis – which one is better?
-
Thorax Pendulum Test
-
Spine Accelerations
-
Subcycling
-
The consistency condition
-
The tension test
-
The continuum tangent matrix for plastic flow
-
The consistent tangent matrix
-
Strain rate
-
Strain measures of solid elements
-
Switching from implicit to explicit
-
There is no load applied to the blank when I used *LOAD_MASK. What might be the problem?
-
System-/Parameter Identification
-
Strategies for metamodel-based optimization
-
Strategy Single Iteration vs. Sequential
-
Time integration
-
Tibia Load Cells
-
Topology Optimization
-
Time step size
-
Tied, Tied Offset, and Tiebreak Contacts
-
Tutorials
-
Using the Model
-
Upper and Lower Neck Load Cell
-
Using the Model
-
Using the Model
-
Units
-
Units
-
Total energy
-
Upgrade a Network License (Microsoft Windows)
-
Upgrade a Network License (Linux/Unix/Solaris)
-
Use the card of *CONSTRAINED_RIGID_BODY_STOPPERSYou can constrain the displacement by specifying a negative value for LCMAX and LCMIN.How is seamless springback analysis done with LSDYNA?
-
Tutorials
-
Training Class Handouts
-
User Defined Solvers
-
User Defined Result Extraction
-
v3.8 to v3.9
-
v3.6 to v3.8
-
v3.1 to v3.6
-
v3.0 to v3.1
-
v2.5 to v3.0
-
v2.0 to v2.5
-
v1.5 to v2.0
-
USSID
-
Viscoelastic materials
-
Viscoplastic strain rate formulation (VP)
-
What are the differences between implicit and explicit?
-
What are the differences between smooth and non-smooth trimming?
-
What can I do if the direction of the pressure is not reasonable after the mesh had been refined adaptively?
-
What can I do if the mesh for the last state was not written to the d3plot after restarting from d3dumpxx?
-
Welcome to LS-OPT Support Site
-
What are the fundamental differences between RBF and FFNN?
-
What do I have to consider when running LS-OPT on Windows?
-
Videos
-
What is FLD?
-
What do the ANOVA bars mean?
-
What is the difference between a discrete beam and a spring ?
-
What is the effect of R value (material anisotropic parameter) on FLD?
-
What is the effect of R-value on material formability?
-
What is the material formability?
-
What is the proper punch speed that could be used in stamping simulation?
-
What is the use of defining a box for drawbead?
-
What is the use of RIGID-BODY_STOPPER?
-
When I a used drawbead in the forming analysis, it was observed that some of the elements which moved over the bead line were distorted, and there is no obvious reason for this effect. What might be the problem?
-
What is mass scaling?
-
What is the difference between *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_ SINGLE_SURFACE and *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_GENERAL ?
-
What is the IGNORE flag good for?
-
What is the commonly used contact type in stamping analysis?
-
What is the proper strategy to switch from implicit and explicit method or from explicit to implicit method?
-
What kind of velocity pattern is better for metal forming analysis?
-
When I attempt to do a springback analysis, I sometimes have difficulty in obtaining a converged solution. What options are available to improve convergence of springback?
-
When I did dynamic relaxation analysis in gravity loading process, it took a long time to get a converged solution. Is there a way to make this analysis faster?
-
When I did forming simulation, I found that a material failure was predicted earlier then expected, what might be the problem?
-
When I do springback analysis, the prediction is not satisfactory. I didn’t find any problem in the input deck. What should I check to improve the solution quality?
-
What is the difference between main and total stochastic contributions?
-
What is topology optimization?
-
WorldSID 50%
-
When I trim the blank using IGES file, there is a message such as “Entity type xxx form 0 not supported # lines = x”. What does it mean?
-
When I use constrain method (SOFT=4 in the FORMING_ONE_WAY_xx card), the calculation terminates immediately, what is the problem?
-
When I use FEA, I don’t know how big the mesh size should be. Would you please tell me what is the proper mesh size?
-
When I used coarsening, I found that there is an error message:’ Something is wrong, sub: nextele’. What is the problem, and how can I avoid it?
-
When the constraint contact is used, the calculation crashes during the forming analysis. What needs to be done to prevent this?
-
Why dynamic relaxation doesn’t seem to work at times?
-
Will the mesh coarsening affect the accuracy of springback prediction?
-
When I run forming simulation, I had such message as “Error: slaves nodes may cross the surface, please check your model, job continues.” I’ve checked my input deck and didn’t find any obvious mistake for the mesh. How can I fix this problem?
-
When I tried to trim the mesh after forming, the generated ‘dynain’ file contains the mesh without trimming, what is the problem and how can I fix it?
-
When I trimmed the mesh after forming, I only used one trim curve (in IGES format), but LSDYNA found 10 trimming curves. Accordingly, the result was not acceptable. What was the problem?
-
When I use mesh adaptivity in my stamping simulation I don’t know how to define the proper adaptive frequency. Would you please give me some suggestions?
-
When I use the implicit method to do springback analysis I cannot obtain a converged solution no matter what I’ve done. Do I have some other choices to obtain a converged solution for springback prediction?
-
When I used implicit method to do springback analysis, the iteration information was not output or displayed in the screen. I think this iteration information is important for me to monitor the convergence status. How can I display this information?
-
When I used switch method in my calculation, I used explicit method and then I changed to implicit method. In the later implicit calculation process, it was seen that the contact didn’t work properly. What was the problem, and how can I avoid this?
-
When I used the seamless method to do both forming and springback analysis, a converged solution wasn’t obtained. I don’t want to repeat the forming analysis. Is there a way I can repeat the springback analysis from the previous output files?
-
When we do springback analysis, we have two choices to do it, i.e. using implicit and explicit method (dynamic relaxation). What is the advantage of using the implicit method in springback analysis?
-
Why does the restart of the springback analysis not work?
-
Worst-case Design
-
Why does the checking of the *DATABASE cards return an error, but the binout files are generated correcty?
Subcategories